
35% Cost Reduction — LCL from China.
A DTC brand selling home goods on Amazon FBA and Shopify discovered they were overpaying 4x for ocean freight. Here's how LCL consolidation cut their $380K annual freight budget by over $42K.
The Challenge
A direct-to-consumer brand sells home goods on Amazon FBA and Shopify. Its inventory came from suppliers in Shenzhen, China. The brand shipped 100% of that inventory by air. The team did this because they thought ocean freight meant booking a full 20ft or 40ft container. So they never priced the middle option that sits between a parcel and a full container.
That belief was expensive. Air freight is billed on chargeable weight, which is the actual weight of a box or its volume weight, whichever is greater. Home goods are bulky and light. A carton of cushions or storage bins fills a lot of space and weighs very little. So most of the $8–12 per kilogram was paid for air, not for product.
At those rates freight ate 22% of the cost of goods sold. Annual freight spend had climbed to $380K. Each new SKU made it worse, because a bigger box costs more to fly than a small one. Raising prices began to look like the only lever left. On a marketplace where buyers compare in one click, that lever is a risky one to pull.
The volume itself was modest. The brand moved 8–10 CBM per month, which is well short of what a 20ft container holds. Buying a full container would have meant ordering months of stock at once. That ties up cash in stock and adds storage cost at both ends of the lane. For a brand funding growth out of its own margin, that trade was not on the table.
Speed was the other constraint. Amazon rewards sellers who keep stock flowing and penalizes the ones who run dry. Air freight was costly, but it was fast, and fast is what kept the listings live and the reviews coming. Any move to ocean had to protect that rhythm. A cheaper lane that caused a stockout would cost far more than it saved.
The Solution
Suaid Global structured a bi-weekly LCL consolidation program from a partner CFS in Shenzhen to Los Angeles. LCL means less than container load. Cargo from several shippers shares one container, and each shipper pays for the space it takes. That gave the brand ocean pricing with no full-container commitment. It also gave the brand a sailing every two weeks, instead of one big buy that had to last for months.
The volume fit the model well. Ocean carriers bill LCL on volume or weight, whichever is greater, so light bulky cargo is charged on the space it fills. Home goods are charged the same way in the air. The difference is the rate for that space, and on the China to USA ocean lane it is a fraction of the air rate. Moving the same cubic meters by sea was the single biggest lever on the table.
The program did not remove air freight. It reassigned it. Regular, forecastable stock — about 70% of monthly volume — moved by ocean LCL at $1.20–1.80 per CBM on a 28–35 day transit. New product launches and seasonal restocks stayed on air, roughly 30% of volume. Air dependency fell from 100% to 30%, and what was left got spent where speed actually earns something.
The third shift was planning. A 28–35 day transit only works if the order is placed before the stock is needed. Suaid Global set a 45-day rolling forecast cycle with the brand's team. Purchase orders were cut against that forecast, not against a low-stock alert from the seller dashboard. This is what turned a slower lane into a predictable one.
Scope mattered as much as mode. The program ran from the supplier's door in Shenzhen to the FBA receiving dock, so no leg was left for the brand. Licensed customs broker partners handled entry into the United States. A partner prep facility near the port handled FBA labeling, and drayage partners ran the cargo between the port, prep floor and dock. The brand kept one point of contact for the whole chain, and one invoice for it.
Services Used
LCL Ocean Freight
View service
Customs Brokerage
View service
FBA Prep & Labeling
View service
Ground & Drayage
Retail & E-Commerce
How the Program Went Live
Onboarding started at the supplier, not at the port. Suaid Global collected carton sizes, weights and product details for every SKU in the plan. That data set the booked volume for each sailing, and the same figures fed the FBA carton records. Suppliers then received a booking calendar with the cargo cut-off for each consolidation. Cargo that missed a cut-off waited for the next slot instead of being flown at short notice.
Documents were the second workstream. Ocean imports into the United States need a security filing before the cargo is loaded at origin. Each shipment also needs a commercial invoice, a packing list and the bill of lading, all matching each other. Licensed customs broker partners filed the security data inside the window and prepared the entry. Product classification was agreed once, up front, and reused on every shipment, which removes a common source of delay.
The lane then ran on a fixed rhythm. Every two weeks cargo was received and measured at the origin CFS, loaded and sailed. On arrival in Los Angeles the container was deconsolidated and cleared. Drayage partners moved the cargo to the prep facility, where cartons were labeled to FBA standards and delivered against booked appointments. The same steps, in the same order, every cycle.
The brand followed each shipment by milestone: received, loaded, sailed, arrived, cleared, delivered. Milestone updates replaced the daily chase calls that short air bookings used to need. The plan was also tuned during the first cycles. The 70/30 split was not fixed on day one. SKUs moved between ocean and air as the forecast showed which ones really needed the speed.
Peaks got their own treatment. Seasonal restocks were booked earlier against the same 45-day cycle, so the brand paid ocean rates for demand it could already see. Air stayed open for launches, and for anything the forecast missed or a supplier delivered late. A short review each month set booked volume against sold volume and reset the next cycle. That review is what kept the split honest as the catalog changed.
The Results
The switch reached full effect inside 90 days. Total shipping cost fell 35%. Monthly freight expense dropped from $31,667 to $20,583. Shipping fell from 22% of the cost of goods sold to 14%, and that eight-point swing landed straight in unit economics. Same products, same prices, and a better margin on every unit the brand sold.
Transit of 28–35 days proved predictable, and predictable was the part that mattered. Because it lined up with the 45-day planning cycle, stock arrived before it was needed rather than after. That took away the rush air bookings the brand used to make when a listing ran low. Rush freight is the most expensive freight a seller can buy. The program simply stopped creating the need for it.
On the compliance side, the program recorded no customs holds across the 12-month period. Deliveries landed on the booked FBA appointments. That came out of the dull parts of the design. One agreed classification, filings made inside the window, and carton data that matched what turned up. Clean paperwork is what keeps cargo moving, and it is the cheapest part of the chain to get right.
Over 12 months the program delivered $42,000 in savings. The brand put that money into marketing and product development instead of freight invoices. Market share grew without a price increase, which is the kind of growth that holds up in a crowded marketplace. The freight line stopped being the thing that decided what the brand could afford to sell.
Shipping from China? You Might Be Overpaying.
Let us analyze your freight spend. LCL consolidation could save you 30–40% if you're currently using air freight for regular inventory.